SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC security-audit-owasp

Full OWASP, Nmap, Nikto vulnerability assessment for OpenClaw deployments. Scan your infrastructure, harden configs, and generate compliance reports.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: larios613-hub v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 283 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

AnalyzerSecurityInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security references/owasp-checklist.md:8
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    - [ ] Test privilege escalation (user → admin)
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:6
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    tags: [security, owasp, nmap, nikto, vulnerability, audit, pentest, hardening, compliance, infrastructure]
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:8
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    trigger: "security audit vulnerability scan penetration test OWASP hardening"
    detector

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "source"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "trigger"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 283 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 149: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate security-audit skill, but it can run active network scans with broad target scope and limited user-facing safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026