SKILLEMALL.ai

BD Automation Workflow Plus - (自动化 工作流 助手)

帮你把每周重复做的事变成自动运行的机器人。识别高价值自动化场景、选对工具(Dify / Coze / n8n 工作流,或零Token的RPA脚本)、设计流程模板、计算ROI回报。当用户提到"自动化"、"重复任务"、"工作流"、"提效"、"节省时间"、"自动机器人"、"RPA"、"流程自动化"、"automate"、"automation"、"workflow"时触发。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: laziobird v1.0.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 507 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureZapierGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Automation Workflow Plus - (自动化 工作流 助手)) differs from the folder (automation-workflow-plus)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 70 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2507 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -233 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 185: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 70 items
  • +4Has examples (24 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is mostly an automation guide, but it gives under-scoped advice about passwords, saved login cookies, and internal financial data workflows.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026