SKILLEMALL.ai

BF processon-mindmap-generator

ProcessOn 官方研发的 AI 脑图生成工具,专注于将自然语言、Markdown、长文本、文档、网页、图片文字等内容,一键生成结构清晰、层级分明、可编辑的专业思维导图。 无论是文章总结、资料整理、文档拆解、知识点归纳、学习路径梳理,还是读书笔记、论文文献梳理、会议纪要提炼、工作报告总结、方案大纲生成、项目任务拆解、头脑风暴与创意发散,都可以通过本技能快速生成专业脑图,帮助用户把零散内容转化为清晰的结构化知识。 本技能支持思维导图、逻辑图、组织结构图、鱼骨图、时间轴、树形图、表格图等 7 种专业图形布局,并深度集成 ProcessOn 在线协同平台。生成后的思维导图可在线编辑、协作修改、高效复用,适合职场办公、学习复习、科研阅读、知识管理和方案策划等场景。 注意:本技能主要用于生成思维导图和知识结构类脑图,不适用于流程图、泳道图、时序图、系统架构图、ER 图、Mermaid 图等流程或技术图表生成场景。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ying zhang @po v1.1.10 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 2 058 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: url

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: url
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: url

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: url
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: url
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 59 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2058 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 409: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 59 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill does generate ProcessOn mind maps, but it also adds runtime update/install behavior and uploads user content to a cloud service with limited upfront disclosure.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026