SKILLEMALL.ai

AC manifesto-hci

Implement "Explicit State & Continuous Consensus" HCI pattern (v3.0). Combat information entropy, prevent intent drift, and maintain a shared source of truth (Manifesto) across long-term interactions using Tri-Track Architecture and Git-backed state management. Use when starting or managing a project (coding, creative writing, complex planning) that requires high reliability and zero-drift execution. Triggers on phrases like "start project", "manage state", "explicit consensus", "manifesto", "/manifesto start", or when a `project_id` is provided.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: LeoZhoski v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 696 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 5 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 696 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 552: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 5)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is built for local project memory, but it automatically stores full conversations and creates Git history with limited user control.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026