BC learn-prototype
当用户要做/研究一个东西、想提升某个技能、或觉得某个产出不够好想改进时使用。用「改良主义」先逼出一个最垃圾但能跑的原型，再引导他自己洞察缺陷、提出问题，提改良假说→实践检验→迭代，信奉「洞察缺陷 > 如何优化 > 最终答案」，并把每次改进的方法本身沉淀成方法论。触发场景：要做 X、研究 X、提升 X、X 做得不好想改进、怎么优化 X、不知从哪下手做。
当用户要做/研究一个东西、想提升某个技能、或觉得某个产出不够好想改进时使用。用「改良主义」先逼出一个最垃圾但能跑的原型，再引导他自己洞察缺陷、提出问题，提改良假说→实践检验→迭代，信奉「洞察缺陷 > 如何优化 > 最终答案」，并把每次改进的方法本身沉淀成方法论。触发场景：要做 X、研究 X、提升 X、X…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 4 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 246 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 176: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.