SKILLEMALL.ai

AC feature-modification-workflow

A structured workflow for modifying existing features. TRIGGER when: user says "I want to change a feature", "optimize xxx", "check if xxx has room for improvement", "fix a bug", or any request involving feature modifications. Choose the appropriate workflow based on scenario complexity: simple issues go straight to code, complex issues follow the full process.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: liancheng v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 2 235 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: A structured workflow for modifying existing features. TRIGGER whe… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 73 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2235 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 363: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 73 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a broad but transparent coding workflow for changing existing features, with no hidden installer, scripts, credentials, or persistence.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026