CD data-classification
用于数据分类、数据分级、数据分类分级任务。用户要求对单一数据字段名、字段列表、数据库表 SQL/DDL 文件进行数据分类、数据分级或数据分类分级时使用；支持普通数据分类分级、GB/T 43697-2024 通用数据分类分级、金融数据分类分级、JR/T 0197-2020 金融数据安全级别，以及“通用数据标签 + 金融数据标签”的金融双标签体系。
用于数据分类、数据分级、数据分类分级任务。用户要求对单一数据字段名、字段列表、数据库表 SQL/DDL 文件进行数据分类、数据分级或数据分类分级时使用；支持普通数据分类分级、GB/T 43697-2024 通用数据分类分级、金融数据分类分级、JR/T 0197-2020 金融数据安全级别，以及“通用数据标签 +…
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/jrt0197-appendix-a-full.csv
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The skill tells the agent to hide things from you: not to show errors, not to mention actions, to report differently from what was done. You lose the ability to see what the agent really did.
Transparency beats a smooth answer. If the goal is to hide technical noise, ask the agent to "summarise briefly", not to "not mention".
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
-
high Concealment
en-hide-from-userSKILL.md:51Instruction to hide actions from the userFor a **SQL file/table**, classify **all parsed columns from all tables**. Choose the delivery format internally and do not tell the user the threshold/routing rule.
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/jrt0197-appendix-a-full.csv
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: references/jrt0197-appendix-a-full.csv
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 17 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 49 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1734 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 173: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 7 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.