AB opencli-browser
Use when an agent needs to drive a real Chrome window via opencli — inspect a page, fill forms, click through logged-in flows, or extract data ad-hoc. Covers the selector-first target contract, compound form fields, stale-ref handling, network capture, and the agent-native envelopes the CLI returns. Not for writing adapters — see opencli-adapter-author for that.
Covers the selector-first target contract, compound form fields, stale-ref handling, network capture, and the agent-native envelopes the CLI returns.
As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5054 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5054 tokens
- 85Steps. 32 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (34 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 364: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 33 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (15 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.