SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC agent-creator

Full workflow for creating an OpenClaw Agent. Use when the user says 'create an agent', 'make a new agent', 'add a bot', or needs to set up a new AI assistant. Covers the complete setup process including (1) adding agent config and peer bindings to openclaw.json, (2) creating workspace directory with SOUL.md persona, (3) scaffolding required folders and files, (4) copying agent runtime configs from main, (5) restarting gateway to apply changes.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Dian v1.0.1 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 336 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agent-creator) differs from the folder (sub-agent-creator)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 26 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1336 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 448: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill appears to create OpenClaw agents as advertised, but it makes persistent local configuration changes, copies auth profiles, and restarts the gateway with limited consent controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026