BD linkfox-aigc-imagegen-brand-gene-extract
品牌基因样式提取原子技能。根据商品图片与用户品牌基因参数(主色、字体、平台、地区、语言),提取统一的品牌视觉语言(Brand DNA),输出结构化 brandGeneJson 供下游原子技能消费。品牌基因提取、brand gene extract、brand DNA、品牌视觉定义、品牌调性提取、brand style extraction、visual identity extraction。被套图编排层(linkfox-aigc-imagegen-cloth / product 套图编排路径)在步骤三中调用;当用户说"提取品牌基因"、"定义品牌风格"、"brand gene"、"品牌视觉"时触发。
品牌基因样式提取原子技能。根据商品图片与用户品牌基因参数(主色、字体、平台、地区、语言),提取统一的品牌视觉语言(Brand DNA),输出结构化 brandGeneJson 供下游原子技能消费。品牌基因提取、brand gene extract、brand DNA、品牌视觉定义、品牌调性提取、brand…
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:13Writes to a shell startup file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- macOS zsh:`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.zshrc && source ~/.zshrc`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:14Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition)- Linux bash:`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc`
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/onboarding.py:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)or "eyJh…iJ9")
quoted
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 53 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1901 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 303: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 53 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.