BF linkfox-amazon-ads-manager
亚马逊广告（Amazon Ads）管理技能，覆盖 SP/SB/SD 的查询与创建/修改。Sponsored Brands 同时支持 V3 Legacy 与 V4：新活动、多 Ad Group、Ad/Creative 默认走 V4，历史 Legacy 可显式走 V3，Keyword/Target 按 Campaign 结构通过版本化脚本调用 Amazon 共享 targeting 资源；禁止 V4 失败后自动回落 V3，禁止用 V3 静默截断多 Ad Group 数据。适用于查询、创建、调价、改预算、改状态及管理 SP/SB/SD 广告。本技能依赖 linkfox-amazon-ads-auth；不覆盖 Sponsored Television / DSP。
亚马逊广告（Amazon Ads）管理技能，覆盖 SP/SB/SD 的查询与创建/修改。Sponsored Brands 同时支持 V3 Legacy 与 V4：新活动、多 Ad Group、Ad/Creative 默认走 V4，历史 Legacy 可显式走 V3，Keyword/Target 按 Campaign…
As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/sb/*.py
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:13Writes to a shell startup file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- macOS zsh：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.zshrc && source ~/.zshrc`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:14Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition)- Linux bash：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc`
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/onboarding.py:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)or "eyJh…iJ9")
quoted
Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/sb/*.py - note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 9, 34, 72, 75, 76, 80): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/sb/*.py
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 32 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Steps. 41 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3244 tokens
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (10 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 332: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 30 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.