BD linkfox-jiimore-product-discovery
基于极目数据的亚马逊商品发掘与潜力爆品挖掘。当用户提到产品挖掘、潜力爆品、高转化选品、点击增长分析、市场增长机会、关键词选品、FBA利润筛选、细分市场商品发掘、卖家来源筛选、product mining, potential bestsellers, high-conversion product selection, market growth opportunities, Jiimore data, FBA profitability screening, keyword-based product selection时触发此技能。即使用户未明确提及"极目"，只要其需求涉及基于转化率、点击量和利润指标的亚马逊关键词驱动选品，也应触发此技能。
As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:13Writes to a shell startup file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- macOS zsh：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.zshrc && source ~/.zshrc`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:14Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition)- Linux bash：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc`
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/onboarding.py:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)or "eyJh…iJ9")
quoted
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 31 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2342 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 326: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.