BC linkfox-keepa-product-search
基于Keepa数据的亚马逊高级商品搜索与筛选，支持品类、价格、月销量、关键词、BSR排名、评论数、评分、包装尺寸、重量、配送方式等多维度条件。当用户提到Keepa选品、亚马逊商品查找、高级选品、BSR筛选、按销售排名选品、月销量过滤、关键词选品、品类选品、竞品筛选、小众商品发掘、历史排名筛选、Keepa product selection, advanced product selection, BSR filtering, sales filtering, category search, competitor screening, historical data filtering, Amazon product selection时触发此技能。即使用户未明确提及"Keepa"，只要其需求涉及多条件亚马逊商品搜索、按销售指标筛选商品或超越简单关键词搜索的高级选品，也应触发此技能。
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenreferences/api.md:89High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)| mont…Ago .. mont…Ago | integer | 最近12个月每月的月销量 |
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:13Writes to a shell startup file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- macOS zsh：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.zshrc && source ~/.zshrc`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcreferences/onboarding.md:14Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition)- Linux bash：`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc`
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenscripts/onboarding.py:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)or "eyJh…iJ9")
quoted
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
- 85Steps. 39 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3492 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 397: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 22 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.