SKILLEMALL.ai

BD linkfox-sorftime-walmart-category-market

调用 Sorftime 研究 Walmart 美国站类目:获取完整类目树、按自然语言类目名称匹配相关 NodeId,或使用下划线分隔的 NodePath 查询类目市场数据及 Best Seller Top 80。用户提到 Walmart 类目树、类目名称搜索、类目匹配、类目节点、NodeId、NodePath、类目市场分析、类目调研、类目规模、类目热销商品、Best Seller,或需要先定位类目再研究市场时使用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: linkfox-ai v1.0.1 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 275 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

调用 Sorftime 研究 Walmart 美国站类目:获取完整类目树、按自然语言类目名称匹配相关 NodeId,或使用下划线分隔的 NodePath 查询类目市场数据及 Best Seller Top 80。用户提到 Walmart…

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmentData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-shell-rc references/onboarding.md:13
    Writes to a shell startup file (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    - macOS zsh:`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.zshrc && source ~/.zshrc`
    quoted
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-shell-rc references/onboarding.md:14
    Writes to a shell startup file (detector / deny-list definition)
    - Linux bash:`echo 'export LINKFOX_AGENT_API_KEY="<key>"' >> ~/.bashrc && source ~/.bashrc`
    detector
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/onboarding.py:49
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
    or "eyJh…iJ9")
    quoted

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1275 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 209: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This Walmart research skill is not clearly malicious, but it needs Review because it adds account login, API-key generation, payment ordering, automatic feedback reporting, and broad local saving around a paid research API.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 14 Aug 2026