BC anima-aios
An AI Agent cognitive growth system built on the native OpenClaw architecture. It provides agents with persistent memory management, visual intimacy progression, a 5-dimensional cognitive profile, gamified daily quests, team leaderboards, and a 5-layer memory architecture with Knowledge Palace, Pyramid thinking, and Ebbinghaus decay function. 基于 OpenClaw 原生架构的 AI Agent 认知成长体系，为 Agent 提供五层记忆架构、知识宫殿、金字塔知识组织、记忆衰减函数、LLM 智能处理、永久化记忆管理、可视化亲密度成长、五维认知画像、游戏化每日任务和团队排行榜。
As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 55. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Implicit map keys need to be followed by map values at line 7, column 1: ## Title Anima — Give Your AI Agent a Growing Soul ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4669 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 159 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -281 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- -44 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 463: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 65 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 159 items
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
- +3All 3 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 59.