SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD esfj-coach

［何时使用］当 ESFJ 用户需要成长指导时，特别是处理过度付出、寻求认可、变化抵触等 ESFJ 专属卡点。触发场景："我是 ESFJ，很在意别人怎么看我"、"ESFJ 如何减少认可依赖"、"ESFJ 学会拒绝"。ESFJ 是"执政官"类型，热心助人但可能过度依赖他人认可。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: lj22503 v1.8.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 542 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "skill_type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "related_skills"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "self_improvement"

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (esfj-coach) differs from the folder (lj22503-esfj-coach)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 85 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1542 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -232 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 137: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 85 items
  • +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This coaching skill appears to mix ESFJ packaging with INTP coaching content and asks the agent to keep ongoing personal growth records without clear user consent or retention controls.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026