SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD infj-coach

［何时使用］当用户明确说"我是 INFJ"且需要成长/职业/学习指导时触发。触发关键词："我是 INFJ"、"INFJ 成长"、"INFJ 职业"、"INFJ 迷茫"、"分析瘫痪"、"想太多做太少"。不触发：纯技术任务（如写代码）、非 INFJ 用户主动说明（如"我是 ENFP"）、模糊情绪表达（如"心情不好"）无 INFJ 上下文。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: lj22503 v1.8.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 570 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "created"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "skill_type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "related_skills"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "self_improvement"

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (infj-coach) differs from the folder (lj22503-infj-coach)
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 85 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1570 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -232 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 168: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 85 items
  • +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This looks like a coaching skill rather than malware, but it needs Review because it mixes INFJ and INTP scope and asks to retain sensitive coaching records without clear user controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026