SKILLEMALL.ai

AD ai-coding-exception-control

AI编码异常处理控制框架。当用户要求"编写功能"、"实现接口"、"开发模块"、 "写代码"、"编码"、"需求分析"、"设计"、"测试"、"代码审查"、"重构"时触发。 通过七层防御机制(深度调研→需求引导→设计引导→规格书→架构→提示词→测试→审查→弯路闭环), 从调研阶段开始强制AI完整思考异常路径,杜绝"只走正向流程、异常处理简化"的问题。 包含深度调研引导、引导式需求设计SOP、三维度失败场景穷举法、六层自动化测试框架、 弯路沉淀与持续改进闭环、Audit-Ledger审查交接、可直接复用的12套模板。 适用于任何语言/框架/平台的AI辅助开发项目。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: llimage v1.7.0 MIT-0 14 files body ≈ 2 782 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

AI编码异常处理控制框架。当用户要求"编写功能"、"实现接口"、"开发模块"、 "写代码"、"编码"、"需求分析"、"设计"、"测试"、"代码审查"、"重构"时触发。 通过七层防御机制(深度调研→需求引导→设计引导→规格书→架构→提示词→测试→审查→弯路闭环),…

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 54 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2782 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 281: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 35 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 54 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 10)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a disclosed coding-quality workflow, but it can activate very broadly and directs agents to use network research, persistent project memory, review ledgers, and a potentially disruptive chaos-test script without enough scoping or user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Jul 2026