SKILLEMALL.ai

BB cn-global-compliance

Global compliance checker & data localization audit tool with API-powered regulations database (出海合规检查+数据本地化审计+全球法规数据库API). Check GDPR readiness, CCPA compliance, data localization, cross-border data transfer, payment licensing, content moderation laws, AI Act requirements, and China data outbound transfer (数据出境评估) rules via real API backend. Features: (1) API-powered regulations database covering 7 markets (US/EU/UK/Japan/SEA/ME/Australia), (2) Compliance gap analysis with remediation roadmap, (3) Data outbound transfer self-assessment (数据出境自评), (4) Executable regulations.sh script for CLI access, (5) App Store review compliance checklists. ONLY skill covering Chinese product overseas expansion compliance with API backend + data localization audit. Use when: compliance check, regulatory compliance audit, GDPR readiness, cross-border data compliance, data localization audit, 出海合规, 数据出境评估, GDPR合规, 海外上架, CCPA, COPPA, AI Act compliance. Triggers: compliance checker, regulatory compliance audit, GDPR check, CCPA, data privacy, cross-border data compliance, data localization audit, international launch, 出海合规, 数据出境评估, 合规检查, 中国出海, 海外合规, 跨境数据合规, 隐私合规, app出海, compliance API, regulations API, AI Act compliance, 数据出境自评

ClawHub Agent Skills author: lm203688 v2.3.0 MIT-0 5 files · 1 script body ≈ 3 495 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationSecuritytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
78/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
45
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Shorten the description to 1024 characters.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error description-long description is 1227 chars, limit 1024

Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 54 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3495 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 1227: 120–800 characters recommended
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 54 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 45.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate compliance helper, but its legal/compliance capability claims are broader than the bundled implementation supports and one helper script contacts an external API.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 31 May 2026