SKILLEMALL.ai

BD continuous-learning

持续学习套件 - AI自主记忆管理工作流:自动识别新任务、记录对话到MemPalace、定期做梦分析、提取精华到文档、自我纠错改进。触发词:"持续学习"、"记忆管理"、"自我改进"、"学习体系"。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: long57777 v1.1.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 1 585 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
97
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 3

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 3
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention README.md:252
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    crontab -l
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention setup/install_cron.py:177
    Mentions editing / listing crontab (string literal in code, not executed)
    print("  crontab -l")
    code literal
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention SKILL.md:378
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    crontab -l | grep openclaw

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "dependencies"

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (continuous-learning) differs from the folder (continuous-learning-kit)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 59 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1585 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 98: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -219 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 39 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 59 items
  • +4Has examples (21 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a disclosed continuous-memory skill, but it needs Review because it can keep broad long-term chat memory, run scheduled background jobs, send memory contents to MiniMax, and update core agent files without strong consent or review controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026