SKILLEMALL.ai

BC prompt-boost-skill

用户提问前置增强层(Universal Query Preprocessor)。所有用户提问都必须先经过本技能处理,再决定后续路径。 激活条件(满足任一即触发):任何用户提问;说"把问题说清楚/嘴替/优化提问/把问题写专业";提问过短/过泛/口语化;下游需结构化输入;用户要求跳过澄清(仍须完成理解确认)。 设计目标:动态、场景化,实现「口语化输入→智能拆解补全→多轮确认校验→专业提示词输出」全流程闭环。 安装后须同步更新 AGENTS.md / SOUL.md。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: LONGSASASASASA v2.1.1 MIT-0 29 files body ≈ 851 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 29. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 28 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 851 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -35 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 233: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This prompt-refinement skill is not clearly malicious, but it tries to become a persistent front door for nearly all user requests and includes user-profile behavior without enough control or privacy detail.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026