SKILLEMALL.ai

BD buyer-hw-sw-contract-review

从买方(甲方)视角审核软硬件买卖合同(含安装部署服务):识别不利条款、 交付与验收风险、价款与发票、质保维保、知识产权与许可、数据合规与违约 责任等,并输出分级问题清单与可谈判修订要点;强制对照甲方付款分档与 先票后款标准(货物/软硬件 13% 专票、安装部署等服务 6% 专票)。适用于 用户上传/粘贴采购合同、技术附件、SLA、订单或框架协议,或明确要求 “甲方审核”“买方视角”“软硬件买卖合同审查”。最终以带修订痕迹的 .DOCX 交付。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: longtel-skill v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 610 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

从买方(甲方)视角审核软硬件买卖合同(含安装部署服务):识别不利条款、 交付与验收风险、价款与发票、质保维保、知识产权与许可、数据合规与违约 责任等,并输出分级问题清单与可谈判修订要点;强制对照甲方付款分档与 先票后款标准(货物/软硬件 13% 专票、安装部署等服务 6% 专票)。适用于…

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerWordProcurementInfrastructureCustomer supporttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (buyer-hw-sw-contract-review) differs from the folder (buyer-side-contract-review)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 91 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1610 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 223: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 91 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill provides a coherent buyer-side contract review workflow and only asks for document handling needed to produce the requested redlined DOCX output.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 27 Aug 2026