SKILLEMALL.ai

BD multi-agent-pipeline

多Agent协作研究管线 — 将"调研→框架→执行→审核→迭代→交付"的咨询项目工作流抽象为可复制的标准化协议。触发场景:(1) 新项目需要多Agent协作且横跨多个平台(Claude/Codex/Gemini/Minimax),(2) 咨询类交付物需要多轮结构化审核迭代,(3) 需要建立项目状态追踪机制替代散落的进度文档,(4) 需要防止内部代号/敏感信息泄漏到交付物,(5) 需要明确Human决策节点避免Agent过度自主。核心解决的问题:审核意见靠聊天中转导致失真、内部代号泄漏到v4才发现、Human决策点散落在对话中无法追溯。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: LorwaLeroy v1.0.0 MIT-0 25 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 1 813 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 25. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (multi-agent-pipeline) differs from the folder (consulting-agent-pipeline)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1813 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 270: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
  • +3All 5 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed local-file workflow for coordinating consulting and research agents; its main risks are expected project-file writes and optional notes outside the project folder.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026