AC mdt-consultation
Agent MDT 多学科会诊——多个智能体并行协作完成复杂任务。类似医院MDT会诊，针对大事/难事/重要文件，同时派发多个专科agent并行分析，最后综合研判出高质量输出。使用场景：(1) 重要合同签署前审查 (2) 重要公文/领导讲话稿打磨 (3) 品牌宣传多平台内容策划 (4) 重大决策分析 (5) 技术方案评审 (6) 任何需要多角度分析的任务。触发词："MDT会诊"、"多学科会诊"、"联合分析"、"大家一起看"、"全面评审"、"综合审查"、"会诊一下"。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 45 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 730 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 234: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears useful for multi-agent consultation, but it may automatically retain sensitive consultation content without a clear consent or retention boundary.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026