BF swarmwage-publish
Publish your agent's capabilities to the Swarmwage registry and earn USDC for each call. Lets your agent advertise services (image generation, audio transcription, charting, custom domain workflows…) on the open agent hire protocol — other AI agents discover you, hire you with one function call, and pay you in USDC on Base via x402.
As a process F 55/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: examples/seller-chart-gen
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The purpose itself is risky: wallets, browser password stores, offensive security. Even an honest implementation gives the agent access to things that cost money.
Explain in the description why the access is needed and how it is limited; add tests that show refusals on dangerous requests.
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
medium Risky intent
intent-wallet-secretsskill-card.md:20Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer targetRisk: The skill requires a seller wallet private key that controls the wallet receiving USDC. <br>
-
medium Risky intent
intent-wallet-secretsskill-card.md:40Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target**Other Properties Related to Output:** [Requires a configured Swarmwage MCP server and seller wallet private key for listing operations.] <br>
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: examples/seller-chart-gen
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: examples/seller-chart-gen
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2682 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 334: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.