SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF scheduled-webhook-push

This skill should be used when users want to set up scheduled or recurring content push to WeChat Work group webhooks. It supports flexible scheduling including daily, weekly, monthly (specific date), and advanced patterns like last Monday of each month. Trigger phrases include webhook推送, 定时推送, 推送到企微, 企微群机器人, scheduled push, periodic webhook, 按天推送, 按周推送, 按月推送.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: LuckyEthan v1.0.1 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 311 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 34/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: url

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
85
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
34/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: url
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: url

Process rating: all ten parameters 34/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: url
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: url
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 14 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (scheduled-webhook-push) differs from the folder (wecom-post-in-group)
  • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1311 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 362: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill does what it says, but it handles a webhook posting credential in a way users should review carefully before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026