SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC bounty-hunter-pro

Autonomous bug bounty hunting with scope safety. Scans targets for subdomains, secrets, vulnerabilities. Uses Certificate Transparency logs, JS analysis, entropy-based secret detection. LLM-powered vulnerability analysis. ALWAYS respects authorized targets only.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Lugave11 v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 762 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerSecurityInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
96
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 4

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 4
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:2
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    Autonomous bug bounty hunting with scope safety for authorized targets, scanning subdomains, JavaScript secrets, misconfigurations, and known vulnerabilities with LLM-assisted analysis. <br>
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:13
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    External security researchers and developers use this skill to run authorized bug bounty scans, analyze findings, and produce structured security reports for approved targets. <br>
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:3
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    description: Autonomous bug bounty hunting with scope safety. Scans targets for subdomains, secrets, vulnerabilities. Uses Certificate Transparency logs, JS analysis, entropy-based secret detection. L
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:13
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)
    Autonomous vulnerability scanning for authorized bug bounty programs.
    detector

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 762 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 262: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a legitimate-looking bug-bounty scanning skill, but it needs review because it can drive live and recurring scans with weak scope controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026