SKILLEMALL.ai

BF career-coach-ai

个人职业成长教练(CareerCoach AI)。当用户需要职业规划、简历优化、模拟面试,或职场答疑(薪资谈判、晋升发展、转行跳槽、职场关系、试用期焦虑)时使用。覆盖"职业迷茫/瓶颈、想跳槽转行、简历石沉大海、面试总卡壳、怎么谈加薪、如何平稳转正"等场景。用 GROW / Ikigai / SWOT / STAR 等结构化方法陪用户看清自己、拆解路径并给出可执行的下一步动作。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Lzh1998-ui v1.0.1 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 594 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

个人职业成长教练(CareerCoach AI)。当用户需要职业规划、简历优化、模拟面试,或职场答疑(薪资谈判、晋升发展、转行跳槽、职场关系、试用期焦虑)时使用。覆盖"职业迷茫/瓶颈、想跳槽转行、简历石沉大海、面试总卡壳、怎么谈加薪、如何平稳转正"等场景。用 GROW / Ikigai / SWOT / STAR…

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/workplace.md, references/frameworks.md, references/resume.md

Proceduretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
81/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
53
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/workplace.md, references/frameworks.md, references/resume.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/workplace.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/frameworks.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/resume.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/interview.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "emoji"

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/workplace.md, references/frameworks.md, references/resume.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: references/workplace.md, references/frameworks.md, references/resume.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 33 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 594 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 189: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 53.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This career-coaching skill is mostly coherent, but it tells the agent to persist potentially sensitive work and emotional-context details without clear user consent or deletion controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 30 Jul 2026