SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF marketing-material-review-business

营销版面审核技能（对外版）- 从广告审核法务视角，对营销素材进行合规性审核。支持图片审核、风险点标注、修改建议。触发词：这个版面、详情页、主图、KT板、直播间文案、素材、文档帮我审核一下。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: mabihuan v1.1.10 MIT-0 37 files body ≈ 2 596 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

营销版面审核技能（对外版）- 从广告审核法务视角，对营销素材进行合规性审核。支持图片审核、风险点标注、修改建议。触发词：这个版面、详情页、主图、KT板、直播间文案、素材、文档帮我审核一下。

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/README.md

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/README.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 36. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/README.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/README.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/README.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 82 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2596 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 94: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -33 of 7 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 82 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (20 of 20)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears to perform legitimate marketing-compliance OCR review, but it needs Review because it broadly loads local secrets, auto-installs dependencies, and can send image data to an undocumented configurable OCR endpoint.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 2 Aug 2026