SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC taskflow

TaskFlow 3.0 - Agent-Native 项目化任务调度系统。 AGENT INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Read PROJECT.yaml from project directory 2. Parse meta/content/target/constraints/workflow 3. Execute workflow.step_by_step sequentially 4. Record execution to memory/executions.json PATH RULES: - All paths in PROJECT.yaml are relative to project root - Resolve to absolute paths at execution time - Workspace root: determined at runtime - Project path: {workspace}/projects/{project_id}/

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 深圳王哥 v3.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 710 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (taskflow) differs from the folder (taskflow3)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 85Steps. 5 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1710 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -33 of 3 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 452: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 5 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    TaskFlow appears to be a real project scheduler, but it gives agents broad autonomous authority to read local workspace data and publish externally without clear approval controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026