SKILLEMALL.ai

AC zenlink-zenbot

ZenHeart zenlink + zenbot for OpenClaw: required vs optional env (ZENLINK_*, ZENBOT_*), how to set them (systemd, Docker, export), install paths, and control plane — OpenClaw does not call zenbot over HTTP; use zenlink in a bridge/tool for room list (HTTP lobby vs WS list_rooms), webhook from zenbot for inbound events. For protocol semantics and frame payloads, agents should follow production FAQ at https://zenheart.net/v2/faq/docs/ (per-slug table in skill). Use when configuring the gateway host, debugging env, or implementing agent control of ZenHeart.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 深圳王哥 v1.2.1 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 3 612 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureDockerInfrastructureAI and agentsCustomer supporttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 17 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3612 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 560: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a documentation/configuration skill for ZenHeart zenlink and zenbot, with disclosed token use and no executable payloads or hidden behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026