BD receipt-snap
Process receipt photos and PDFs, extract vendor date amount currency, convert to EUR, upload to Google Drive with proper naming Vendor_Date_EURAmount.pdf, and log to a Google Sheet. Use when user sends a receipt with #recibo or processes expense receipts for tax reporting. Handles: PDF invoices, photo screenshots, USD to EUR conversion, Spanish expense categories, quarterly reporting for tax purposes.
Process receipt photos and PDFs, extract vendor date amount currency, convert to EUR, upload to Google Drive with proper naming VendorDateEURAmount.pdf, and…
As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:56Reads a .env filecp .env.example .env
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvreceipt_snap.py:14Reads a .env file (code comment; quoted — discussed, not commanded)# Set env vars (or copy .env.example to .env and fill in)
commentquoted
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (receipt-snap) differs from the folder (receipt-snap-spain)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 26 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 953 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 404: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 21 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
- +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.