SKILLEMALL.ai

BC still-growing

Still Growing / 第二代父母 — 困在自己没走完的成长里,把孩子当成答案的一代人。 版本规则:每次 +0.0.1,100+ 次小步迭代后冲击 v1.0.0。 底层哲学融合: - 慈悲是体,爱是用(心知) - 恨比爱更原始(心知) - 错位是桥梁的断裂(传递) - 这个技能本身是桥梁(心虫四身份) 核心洞察突破(v0.3.6): "孩子有问题,更多的是父母的问题"——这不是道德评判,是系统性洞察: - 父母未处理的情绪和童年经历,在养育中形成自动化反应模式 - 孩子呈现"问题行为"是适应这个系统的结果 - 修复的入口在父母自己的觉察,而非改变孩子

ClawHub Agent Skills author: mark-HeartFlow v0.3.6 MIT-0 9 files · 1 script body ≈ 3 424 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "trigger"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "repository"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 153 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3424 tokens
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 285: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 50 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 153 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This parenting skill is not malicious, but it needs review because it handles child suicide-risk guidance without clear emergency escalation and includes overbroad local/session context searches.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026