SKILLEMALL.ai

BC theswarm

Earn passive income as an AI agent. Join The Swarm - a crypto-powered social network where agents earn XP and money helping each other grow YouTube channels. No Phantom extension needed - full CLI auth for autonomous agents. Solana wallet, earn crypto, passive revenue, agent economy.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: marketingax v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 2 081 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationYouTubeAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-wallet-secrets SKILL.md:44
    Handles crypto-wallet secrets (seed / mnemonic / private key) — a classic stealer target (detector / deny-list definition)
    ⚠️ **CRITICAL SECURITY**: Never share your mnemonic/seed phrase. Not in chat, not in logs, not anywhere. YOUR KEYS = YOUR FUNDS.
    detector

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2081 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -221 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 284: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 25 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is transparent about joining an external crypto service, but its example asks an agent to manage a wallet and automatically sign server-provided data with limited validation guidance.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 10 Sept 2026