BF audit-website
Perform full health check on websites, identifying technical friction points and user experience issues. Use when: (1) Auditing website performance, (2) Checking for broken links, (3) Analyzing page structure, (4) Testing accessibility, (5) Reviewing security headers.
As a process F 26/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Perform full health check on websites, identifying technical frict… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 26/100
- 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (audit-website) differs from the folder (pls-audit-website)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2130 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 268: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This skill is a straightforward website-audit guide whose network checks and optional third-party tools match its stated purpose.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026