SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF review-common-core

审稿共享引擎。提供所有审稿 skill 通用的分段标注框架、整体审稿框架、审稿核心原则、事实核查分类、审稿自查清单。不单独运行，由其他审稿 skill 引用其 references/ 目录下的文档。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: mayf3 v1.0.0 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 388 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

审稿共享引擎。提供所有审稿 skill 通用的分段标注框架、整体审稿框架、审稿核心原则、事实核查分类、审稿自查清单。不单独运行，由其他审稿 skill 引用其 references/ 目录下的文档。

As a process F 20/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../review-common-core/references/xxx.md

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
20/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../review-common-core/references/xxx.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../review-common-core/references/xxx.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 20/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../review-common-core/references/xxx.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../review-common-core/references/xxx.md
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 388 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 99: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 4 headings
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a shared review checklist package with disclosed local validation scripts and no evidence of hidden or harmful behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Jul 2026