SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB audit-system

Perform structured audits on code, workflows, prompts, and products. Use when: (1) Something is not working as expected, (2) User asks for review or feedback, (3) A system behaves inconsistently, (4) Before deploying or shipping, (5) When optimizing performance or UX, (6) When debugging recurring issues.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Med EDDAHBY v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 725 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 75 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 725 tokens
    • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 305: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 75 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a simple instruction-only audit helper; the main caution is that its trigger wording is broad and may activate for ordinary review or debugging requests.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026