AB cwphil-citation-style
《中國文哲研究集刊》撰稿格式檢查器——中文人文學科論文文獻引用格式化與合規檢查工具。嚴格遵循中央研究院《中國文哲研究集刊》撰稿規範，自動處理中文與外文文獻的腳註、文末參考文獻格式，並支援「同上」「同註」等縮寫規則。只提取用戶提供的真實文獻資料，絕不編造任何書目資訊。Use when the user mentions the journal citation style, requests formatting or checking footnotes/bibliographies for Chinese humanities papers, or needs academic citation compliance verification. Supports: (1) formatting footnotes and end references during paper composition, (2) checking and correcting existing citations, (3) Chinese and Western source handling with proper abbreviations.
《中國文哲研究集刊》撰稿格式檢查器——中文人文學科論文文獻引用格式化與合規檢查工具。嚴格遵循中央研究院《中國文哲研究集刊》撰稿規範，自動處理中文與外文文獻的腳註、文末參考文獻格式，並支援「同上」「同註」等縮寫規則。只提取用戶提供的真實文獻資料，絕不編造任何書目資訊。Use when the user…
As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 30 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 674 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 522: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 30 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.