AC devils-advocate-suite
Execute structured adversarial thinking to stress-test high-stakes decisions, identify systemic risks, and prevent groupthink. Use when the user asks for a strategy review, risk assessment, pre-mortem, Amazon-style PR/FAQ review, or needs to challenge assumptions regarding a project or business model. Make sure to use this skill whenever a decision has dire consequences or shows signs of false consensus.
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 85Steps. 15 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 836 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium 5 test cases, all positive: not one "should refuse" or "should ask first"
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 407: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.