SKILLEMALL.ai

AC multi-agent-orchestrator

Design, build, and manage multi-agent teams that turn a solo operator into a 1000-person organization. Covers team role design (CEO/PM/Engineer/Analyst/Writer/Monitor), inter-agent communication patterns, task distribution, conflict resolution, and priority management. Based on real production experience running 13-agent teams on OpenClaw. Use when the user wants to build an agent team, orchestrate multiple AI agents, design agent roles, set up agent communication, create a one-person company with AI agents, implement multi-agent workflows, or scale from solo to team-of-agents. Triggers on multi-agent, agent team, agent orchestration, AI team, agent collaboration, agent roles, one-person company, solo founder scaling, agent communication, task delegation to agents, swarm intelligence.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Miio-Jinglin v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 317 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (multi-agent-orchestrator) differs from the folder (friday-multi-agent-orchestrator)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 13 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1317 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 795: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a documentation-only skill for planning multi-agent workflows, with disclosed coordination patterns and no hidden executable behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026