BD wechat-article-reader
当用户提供微信公众号文章链接(URL 包含 mp.weixin.qq.com)时,必须使用此 skill 读取文章内容,禁止使用 web_fetch、web_search 或其他方式替代。本 skill 通过专用脚本稳定抓取并返回结构化结果,包括标题、发布时间、作者和正文。
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
ReferenceWriting and documentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: wechat-article-reader (ClawHub)
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-pipe-to-shell-known-hostSKILL.md:37Pipe-to-shell installer from a well-known host (still executes remote code) (code comment)brew install uv # macOS;Linux 用 curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
comment
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (wechat-article-reader) differs from the folder (another-wechat-article-reader)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 599 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 137: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill has a clear WeChat article-reading purpose, but it should be reviewed because one fallback script can fetch arbitrary hosts and the network dependency/scoping story is under-controlled.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 19 Aug 2026