SKILLEMALL.ai

BD wechat-article-reader

当用户提供微信公众号文章链接(URL 包含 mp.weixin.qq.com)时,必须使用此 skill 读取文章内容,禁止使用 web_fetch、web_search 或其他方式替代。本 skill 通过专用脚本稳定抓取并返回结构化结果,包括标题、发布时间、作者和正文。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Miles v0.3.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 599 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ReferenceWriting and documentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: wechat-article-reader (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-pipe-to-shell-known-host SKILL.md:37
    Pipe-to-shell installer from a well-known host (still executes remote code) (code comment)
    brew install uv    # macOS;Linux 用 curl -LsSf https://astral.sh/uv/install.sh | sh
    comment

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (wechat-article-reader) differs from the folder (another-wechat-article-reader)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 599 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 137: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill has a clear WeChat article-reading purpose, but it should be reviewed because one fallback script can fetch arbitrary hosts and the network dependency/scoping story is under-controlled.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 19 Aug 2026