SKILLEMALL.ai

AB youmind-x-article

Write and publish tweets to X (Twitter) with AI — topic research via YouMind knowledge base, 280-char optimized writing, numbered multi-tweet sequences, and one-click publishing through the X account already connected in YouMind. Use when user wants to "tweet", "post on X", "publish to Twitter", or "write a thread".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: YouMind v1.0.0 MIT-0 24 files body ≈ 2 897 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Write and publish tweets to X (Twitter) with AI — topic research via YouMind knowledge base, 280-char optimized writing, numbered multi-tweet sequences, and…

As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
69/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 24. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
    • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 102, 112, 115): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

    Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 24 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
    • 100Steps. 46 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2897 tokens
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 317: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill mostly does what it says, but it also includes under-disclosed abilities to delete X posts and use broader YouMind account features than a tweet writer needs.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 28 May 2026