SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC weread-obsidian

Sync WeRead shelf state, reading progress, visible book content, and note-ready Markdown into a local workspace using the user's logged-in Chrome session. Use when the user wants to inspect WeRead bookshelf status, capture book metadata or text for a specific book, or prepare WeRead material for Obsidian, Feishu, or OpenClaw note workflows.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: MingChaoXu v1.0.1 MIT-0 15 files body ≈ 1 267 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ProcedureObsidianInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (weread-obsidian) differs from the folder (weread-assitant)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Failures and branches. 6 branches
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 34 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1267 tokens
    • high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
    • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • -32 of 8 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 342: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a real WeRead-to-Obsidian bridge, but it should be reviewed because it can use a logged-in browser session and overwrite Obsidian notes without enough explicit user control.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026