SKILLEMALL.ai

BD greenhelix-agent-payment-rails-playbook

The Agent Payment Rails Playbook. Ship multi-protocol agentic payments (x402, ACP, AP2, UCP, MPP) with spending controls, KYA compliance, and escrow protection from first transaction to production.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: mirni v1.3.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 21 113 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 21113 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "price_usd"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "content_type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "executable"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "install"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "credentials"

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 21113 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 55 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 78 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 197: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 55 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 78 items
  • +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a non-executable payment guide, but it needs review because its examples can affect real payments while the sandbox and live-production language is inconsistent.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026