SKILLEMALL.ai

BD greenhelix-bundle-agent-commerce-foundations

The complete foundation for agent-to-agent commerce. Covers B2B transactions, API migration, security hardening, payment rails, pricing strategy, and multi-agent orchestration. 6 guides, $184 value.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: mirni v1.3.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 182 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
38/100
Unfinished process
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "type"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "includes"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "price_usd"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "executable"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "install"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "credentials"

Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100

  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 182 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 198: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 3 headings
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed frontend code-review skill that reads project code and may use optional review subagents, with no hidden installer, credential handling, persistence, or destructive behavior found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026