SKILLEMALL.ai

BD pm-requirement-sharpening-stone

帮助 PM 在需求启动阶段,通过三步对话法(苏格拉底→第一性→奥卡姆)拆清问题本质, 产出可进 review 的 PRD v3.x 终稿。支持按需裁剪章节、按需启用场景定位/Agent 设计/学习循环等可选阶段。 输出优先飞书文档,降级本地 MD。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: X和小克 v2.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 5 039 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

帮助 PM 在需求启动阶段,通过三步对话法(苏格拉底→第一性→奥卡姆)拆清问题本质, 产出可进 review 的 PRD v3.x 终稿。支持按需裁剪章节、按需启用场景定位/Agent 设计/学习循环等可选阶段。 输出优先飞书文档,降级本地 MD。

As a process D 40/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
57
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
40/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5039 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "name_zh"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "scope"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "not_for"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "examples"

Process rating: all ten parameters 40/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pm-requirement-sharpening-stone) differs from the folder (requirement-sharpening-stone)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5039 tokens
  • 100Steps. 183 steps
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 21 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2128 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 124: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 74 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 183 items
  • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This PRD workflow skill is purpose-aligned and disclosed, but users should be aware it can create Feishu documents, use web search, read local project context, and write local process logs.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 25 Jun 2026