BF fubon-cli
AI-agent skill for Taiwan stock/futures/options operations via fubon-cli. Use this skill whenever the user asks about Fubon Neo login, order placement, account/inventory queries, market quote or candle retrieval, realtime subscription, conditional orders, or wants natural-language trading assistance through fubon ask/chat. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly say "fubon-cli" but mentions command-line automation for Fubon trading workflows, JSON trading outputs, or scripted order operations.
As a process F 57/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/validate_skill_doc.py, scripts/build_skill_bundle.py, scripts/publish_skill.py
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
-
high Dangerous commands
cmd-install-from-urlSKILL.md:41Installs a package from an untrusted URL / archivepip install ./wheels/fubo…whl
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/validate_skill_doc.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/build_skill_bundle.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/publish_skill.py
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/validate_skill_doc.py, scripts/build_skill_bundle.py, scripts/publish_skill.py
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 31 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1245 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 505: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.