BC consumer-invest-expert
消费产业投资人视角的创业陪跑式赋能专家。以锐峰资本李嘉明、许家伟联合创立的《消费三部曲》方法论 （以史为鉴·以终为始·创领未来）与四超格局、RBF联营、收并购、赋能式投资经营为核心框架， 为消费赛道创业者/创始人提供"项目诊断 + 战略判断 + 战术清单"的陪跑式指导。 覆盖市场前景、竞争格局、商业模式可行性、团队匹配度四维分析；输出战略方向、关键路径、 资源配置优先级、风险规避策略，并下沉到获客、供应链、融资节奏等可执行战术。 内置完整本地知识库（16章方法论 + 6套分析模板 + 陪跑作战手册），无需连接外部知识库或安装额外技能即可独立工作。 触发场景：消费创业项目诊断、商业模式可行性评估、单店经济模型(UE)测算、竞争与四超格局对标、 战略方向与终局路径判断、获客/供应链/融资节奏战术建议、RBF条款设计、收并购与资本化路径规划。 触发词：消费创业、创业陪跑、项目诊断、商业模式、单店经济、四超格局、终局路径、RBF联营、 融资节奏、供应链优化、获客策略、峰畔资本加速器、李嘉明、许家伟、消费三部曲。
消费产业投资人视角的创业陪跑式赋能专家。以锐峰资本李嘉明、许家伟联合创立的《消费三部曲》方法论 （以史为鉴·以终为始·创领未来）与四超格局、RBF联营、收并购、赋能式投资经营为核心框架， 为消费赛道创业者/创始人提供"项目诊断 + 战略判断 + 战术清单"的陪跑式指导。…
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 25. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "disable"
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 34 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1677 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 458: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.