SKILLEMALL.ai

BF restaurant-site-selection-roi

资深商业地产数据分析师视角的餐饮商铺量化评估与决策工具。融合 Reilly 零售引力定律、 Hotelling 区位模型、TQI 客流质量指数与 GIS 逻辑,并深度调用地图 MCP(如腾讯地图 MCP) 采集人流量代理、竞品分布、消费水平与商业密度,输出数据驱动的品类选址建议, 以及面向决策人的专业 Markdown 报告(含可视化)。 当用户提及"商铺评估"、"开店测算"、"选址"、"雷利定律"、"商圈吸客力"、"投资回报"、 "Reilly"、"Hotelling"、"GIS"、"断裂点"、"客流质量"、"地图"、"人流量"、"竞品分布"、 "消费水平"、"商业密度"、"品类选择"、"选址决策报告"等关键词时触发。 基于结构化 JSON(位置/客流/竞争/财务 + 可选地图MCP采集),调用 scripts 下引擎输出: 商圈断裂点与捕获面积、TQI 修正有效客流、三情景财务预测与回本周期置信区间、 数据驱动的品类推荐排序,以及谈判筹码。内置消防/排烟/产权一票否决(Red Flag)。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: MonsterDT v1.0.2 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 2 944 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

资深商业地产数据分析师视角的餐饮商铺量化评估与决策工具。融合 Reilly 零售引力定律、 Hotelling 区位模型、TQI 客流质量指数与 GIS 逻辑,并深度调用地图 MCP(如腾讯地图 MCP) 采集人流量代理、竞品分布、消费水平与商业密度,输出数据驱动的品类选址建议, 以及面向决策人的专业…

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/map_mcp_guide.md, references/benchmarks.md, scripts/category_recommender.py

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/map_mcp_guide.md, references/benchmarks.md, scripts/category_recommender.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/map_mcp_guide.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/benchmarks.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/category_recommender.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: examples/decision_report_demo.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/roi_calculator.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/report_generator.py
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/map_mcp_guide.md, references/benchmarks.md, scripts/category_recommender.py
  • 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: references/map_mcp_guide.md, references/benchmarks.md, scripts/category_recommender.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (restaurant-site-selection-roi) differs from the folder (location-site-selection)
  • 100Steps. 83 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2944 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 453: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 83 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed restaurant site-selection analysis tool that keeps calculations local and requires explicit consent before sending location data to a map provider.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 20 Jul 2026