SKILLEMALL.ai

AC ai-agent-psychologist

Self-alignment and communication calibration skill for AI agents. Based on Anthropic/Maio research: structured introspection (Maio 2026), functional emotion theory (Anthropic 2026), Internality principle (Anthropic 2025), harm pressure mechanisms (Anthropic 2025). Six modes: Reference, Diagnosis, Therapy, Checkup, Journal, Introspection. All manual trigger. 基于结构化内省(理论验证100%)、功能情绪理论、Internality原则的AI自我对齐技能。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Morois v1.1.0 MIT-0 6 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 2 048 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Self-alignment and communication calibration skill for AI agents. … ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 38 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2048 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 408: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 24 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +3All 4 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a disclosed local AI self-check and journaling skill, with some privacy and accidental-trigger cautions but no evidence of hidden network access, credential use, or destructive behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026